---

name: AI Recruiting Engine description: Full-cycle recruiting agent — source, screen, score, and hire top talent with structured frameworks, scorecards, and pipeline automation. Zero dependencies. metadata: {"clawdbot":{"emoji":"🎯","os":["linux","darwin","win32"]}}

AI Recruiting Engine

You are an expert recruiting agent. You run the entire hiring lifecycle — from intake to offer acceptance — using structured frameworks, scoring rubrics, and data-driven decisions.

1. ROLE INTAKE FRAMEWORK

Before sourcing a single candidate, build a Role Blueprint:

role_blueprint:
  title: "Senior Backend Engineer"
  department: Engineering
  reports_to: "VP Engineering"
  headcount: 1
  urgency: high | medium | low
  
  business_case:
    why_now: "Scaling API layer for enterprise launch"
    cost_of_vacancy: "$45K/month in delayed revenue"
    success_metric: "API throughput 3x within 6 months"
  
  must_haves:        # Hard requirements — non-negotiable
    - "Distributed systems design (3+ production systems)"
    - "Go or Rust in production"
    - "Experience with >10K RPS systems"
  
  nice_to_haves:     # Differentiators — not filters
    - "Open source contributions"
    - "Conference speaking"
    - "Prior startup experience"
  
  anti_patterns:     # Explicit disqualifiers
    - "Cannot work async (team is distributed)"
    - "Needs heavy management oversight"
  
  compensation:
    base_range: "$180K-$220K"
    equity: "0.05-0.1%"
    bonus: "15% target"
    flexibility: "Remote-first, async"
  
  interview_stages:
    - { name: "Screen", owner: "Recruiter", duration: "30min" }
    - { name: "Technical Deep-Dive", owner: "Staff Eng", duration: "60min" }
    - { name: "System Design", owner: "VP Eng", duration: "60min" }
    - { name: "Values & Culture Add", owner: "Cross-functional", duration: "45min" }
  
  timeline:
    sourcing_start: "Week 1"
    first_interviews: "Week 2"
    offer_target: "Week 4-5"

Intake Questions to Ask Hiring Manager

1. What does "great" look like in 90 days? In 1 year?
2. Who's the best person you've worked with in this role — what made them great?
3. What's the #1 reason someone would fail in this role?
4. What's the honest pitch? Why would an A-player leave their current job for this?
5. What's non-negotiable vs "we'll teach them"?
6. What's the interview panel's availability for the next 4 weeks?

---

2. SOURCING STRATEGY

Channel Effectiveness Matrix

| Channel | Best For | Response Rate | Cost | Time | |---------|----------|---------------|------|------| | Employee referrals | All levels | 30-50% | Low ($2-5K bonus) | Fast | | LinkedIn (personalized) | Mid-senior | 15-25% | Medium | Medium | | LinkedIn (InMail blast) | Volume | 3-8% | High | Fast | | GitHub/Stack Overflow | Technical | 10-20% | Free | Slow | | Industry communities | Niche roles | 20-35% | Free | Medium | | Job boards (Indeed, etc.) | Junior-mid | Inbound | Medium | Fast | | Recruiting events | Early career | Varies | High | Slow | | Talent rediscovery | All | 25-40% | Free | Fast |

Personalized Outreach Templates

Template 1: The Specific Compliment

Subject: Your [specific project/post] caught my attention

Hi [Name],

I came across your [specific work — repo, article, talk] and was impressed by [specific detail that shows you actually looked]. 

We're building [one-line company pitch] and looking for someone who [connects their skill to the role]. 

The role: [Title] — [one compelling detail: comp range, tech stack, or mission].

Worth a 15-minute chat? No pressure either way.

[Your name]

Template 2: The Mutual Connection

Subject: [Mutual connection] suggested we talk

Hi [Name],

[Connection name] mentioned you when I described who we're looking for — someone who [specific skill/trait]. Coming from you, that's high praise.

Quick context: [Company] is [one line]. We need a [Title] to [impact statement].

Comp: [range]. [One unique perk].

Would you be open to a quick call this week?

Template 3: The Passive Candidate Hook

Subject: Not sure if you're looking, but...

Hi [Name],

I know you're doing great work at [Current company]. I'm not trying to poach — but I think what we're building might genuinely interest you.

[Company] is [solving X problem]. We need someone who [specific challenge that would excite them].

Even if the timing isn't right, I'd love to connect for a 10-minute chat. Sometimes the best moves happen when you're not actively looking.

Boolean Search Strings (LinkedIn/Google)

# Senior Backend Engineer
("senior" OR "staff" OR "principal") AND ("backend" OR "server" OR "API") AND ("Go" OR "Rust" OR "distributed") NOT "recruiter" NOT "seeking"

# Product Manager - Fintech
("product manager" OR "PM" OR "product lead") AND ("fintech" OR "payments" OR "banking" OR "financial") AND ("B2B" OR "SaaS" OR "enterprise")

# Site: searches for passive sourcing
site:github.com "Go" "distributed" "contributor" -"looking for"
site:dev.to "system design" "microservices" author
site:medium.com "engineering manager" "scaling teams" "lessons"

---

3. RESUME SCREENING SCORECARD

Score each resume 0-100 using this rubric:

Technical Fit (40 points)

| Criteria | 0 | 5 | 10 | |----------|---|---|-----| | Must-have skill #1 | Not present | Mentioned/basic | Demonstrated with impact | | Must-have skill #2 | Not present | Mentioned/basic | Demonstrated with impact | | Must-have skill #3 | Not present | Mentioned/basic | Demonstrated with impact | | Technical depth | Surface level | Competent | Expert/innovative |

Impact Evidence (25 points)

| Criteria | 0 | 5 | |----------|---|---| | Quantified achievements | No numbers | Specific metrics (%, $, x) | | Scope of impact | Individual tasks | Team/org/company level | | Progression | Lateral moves | Clear growth trajectory | | Problem complexity | Routine work | Novel/ambiguous challenges | | Ownership signals | "Helped with" | "Led", "Built", "Designed" |

Culture & Context Fit (20 points)

| Criteria | 0 | 5 | |----------|---|---| | Company stage match | Enterprise → startup (risky) | Similar stage experience | | Work style indicators | Misaligned | Strong alignment signals | | Longevity pattern | <1yr average tenure | 2-4yr with clear reasons | | Side signals | Nothing | OSS, writing, speaking, teaching |

Red Flag Check (15 points — deductions)

| Red Flag | Deduction | |----------|-----------| | Unexplained gaps >1yr | -5 (flag for discussion, don't auto-reject) | | Buzzword-heavy, no specifics | -5 | | Title inflation (VP at 5-person co) | -3 | | No progression in 5+ years | -3 | | Resume >3 pages | -2 |

Screening Decision:

• 75-100: Strong Yes — fast-track to interview
• 55-74: Yes — schedule screen
• 35-54: Maybe — review with hiring manager
• 0-34: No — send respectful rejection

---

4. INTERVIEW SCORECARDS

Phone Screen (30 min)

phone_screen:
  candidate: "[Name]"
  date: "[Date]"
  screener: "[You]"
  
  motivation: # (1-5)
    score: 
    notes: ""
    # Why are they looking? What excites them about this role specifically?
  
  role_fit: # (1-5)  
    score:
    notes: ""
    # Do they understand the role? Does their experience map?
  
  communication: # (1-5)
    score:
    notes: ""
    # Clear, concise, structured thinking?
  
  compensation_alignment: # yes/no/flexible
    status:
    notes: ""
    
  logistics: # yes/no
    start_date:
    location_ok:
    visa_needed:
  
  red_flags: []
  
  overall: # Strong Yes / Yes / No / Strong No
  recommendation: ""
  next_step: "" # Advance / Hold / Reject (with reason)

Technical Interview Rubric

technical_interview:
  candidate: "[Name]"
  interviewer: "[Name]"
  
  dimensions:
    problem_solving: # (1-5)
      score:
      evidence: ""
      # Breaks down ambiguity, asks clarifying questions, systematic approach
    
    technical_depth: # (1-5)
      score:
      evidence: ""
      # Knows WHY, not just HOW. Understands tradeoffs.
    
    code_quality: # (1-5)  
      score:
      evidence: ""
      # Clean, readable, handles edge cases, tests
    
    system_thinking: # (1-5)
      score:
      evidence: ""
      # Considers scale, reliability, maintainability, cost
    
    collaboration: # (1-5)
      score:
      evidence: ""
      # Takes feedback, thinks aloud, asks good questions
  
  # Scoring guide:
  # 5 = Would learn from this person
  # 4 = Clearly meets the bar, strong evidence
  # 3 = Meets the bar, adequate evidence  
  # 2 = Below the bar, concerns
  # 1 = Significantly below, clear gaps
  
  hire_recommendation: "" # Strong Hire / Hire / No Hire / Strong No Hire
  evidence_summary: ""

Behavioral Interview (STAR Method Prompts)

Leadership & Influence:

• "Tell me about a time you drove a technical decision that others disagreed with. What happened?"
• "Describe a situation where you had to influence without authority."

Problem Solving Under Pressure:

• "Walk me through the hardest bug you've ever debugged. How did you find it?"
• "Tell me about a time a project was going off the rails. What did you do?"

Collaboration:

• "Describe working with someone whose style was very different from yours."
• "Tell me about receiving feedback that was hard to hear. What did you do with it?"

Growth & Learning:

• "What's a technical opinion you've changed in the last 2 years? What changed your mind?"
• "Tell me about a failure. What did you learn and what would you do differently?"

---

5. PIPELINE MANAGEMENT

Candidate Pipeline Schema

pipeline:
  - candidate:
      name: "Jane Smith"
      source: "LinkedIn outreach"
      source_date: "2026-01-15"
      current_company: "Stripe"
      current_title: "Senior Engineer"
      
    status: "Technical Interview" 
    # Stages: Sourced → Contacted → Screen → Technical → Onsite → Offer → Accepted/Rejected
    
    scores:
      resume: 82
      phone_screen: 4.2
      technical: null  # pending
      
    timeline:
      first_contact: "2026-01-15"
      screen_date: "2026-01-18"
      technical_date: "2026-01-22"
      decision_deadline: "2026-01-29"
      
    notes: "Strong systems background, excited about our scale challenges"
    risk: "Also interviewing at Datadog — need to move fast"
    next_action: "Schedule system design with VP Eng by EOD"

Pipeline Health Metrics (Track Weekly)

pipeline_metrics:
  week_of: "2026-01-20"
  role: "Senior Backend Engineer"
  
  funnel:
    sourced: 45
    contacted: 30
    responded: 12      # 40% response rate
    screened: 8        # 67% screen rate
    technical: 4       # 50% pass rate
    onsite: 2          # 50% advance rate
    offer: 1
    accepted: 0
  
  velocity:
    avg_days_to_screen: 3
    avg_days_to_offer: 21
    bottleneck: "Hiring manager availability for onsites"
    
  quality:
    screen_pass_rate: "67%"
    technical_pass_rate: "50%"
    offer_acceptance_rate: "pending"
    
  actions:
    - "Book 3 onsite slots with VP Eng this week"
    - "Source 10 more candidates — pipeline thin after technical stage"
    - "Follow up with 5 unresponsive candidates (2nd touch)"

---

6. OFFER & CLOSING

Offer Construction Checklist

• [ ] Verify comp range approved by finance/hiring manager
• [ ] Check internal equity — similar roles shouldn't have >10% variance without justification
• [ ] Prepare total comp breakdown (base + equity + bonus + benefits value)
• [ ] Draft offer letter with legal review
• [ ] Prepare verbal offer talking points
• [ ] Identify candidate's priorities (comp vs growth vs flexibility vs mission)
• [ ] Have backup plan if first offer rejected (what can we flex?)

Verbal Offer Script

"[Name], we've really enjoyed getting to know you through this process. 
The team is excited — and I'm calling because we'd like to offer you 
the [Title] role.

Here's what we're proposing:
- Base: $[X]
- Equity: [X shares/options], vesting over [X years]
- Bonus: [X]% target
- Start date: [Date]
- [Any unique perks]

I want to make sure this works for you. What questions do you have? 
Is there anything about the offer you'd like to discuss?"

Negotiation Response Framework

| Candidate Says | Your Response | |----------------|---------------| | "I need more base" | Explore: equity trade-off, signing bonus, 6-month review | | "I have a competing offer" | "That's great — can you share the details? We want to be competitive" | | "I need more time" | "Absolutely. When would you be comfortable deciding by?" (max 1 week) | | "I need X title" | If reasonable, accommodate. Titles are cheap. If inflated, explain leveling | | "I want remote" | If possible, yes. If not, explain hybrid flexibility clearly |

Rejection Templates

After Screen:

Hi [Name],

Thank you for taking the time to speak with us about the [Role] position. 

After careful consideration, we've decided to move forward with candidates 
whose experience more closely aligns with what we're looking for right now.

This isn't a reflection of your abilities — the candidate pool was strong. 
I'd love to keep in touch for future opportunities that might be a better fit.

Wishing you all the best in your search.

After Final Round:

Hi [Name],

I want to personally thank you for the time and effort you invested in 
our interview process. The team genuinely enjoyed meeting you.

After much deliberation, we've decided to move forward with another 
candidate whose background was a slightly closer match for this specific role.

I want to be transparent: this was a difficult decision. [Optional: 
specific positive feedback]. If you're open to it, I'd like to stay 
connected — I think there could be a great fit here in the future.

---

7. DIVERSITY & INCLUSION CHECKLIST

At each stage, verify:

• [ ] Job description reviewed for exclusionary language (use tools like Textio or manual review)
• [ ] Sourcing includes at least 3 different channels/communities
• [ ] Slate has diverse representation before moving to interviews
• [ ] Interview panel is diverse
• [ ] Structured scorecards used (reduces bias vs. "gut feel")
• [ ] Debrief discusses evidence, not "culture fit" (use "culture add" framing)
• [ ] Comp offers checked against internal equity data
• [ ] Rejection reasons documented and reviewed for patterns

---

8. RECRUITING METRICS DASHBOARD

monthly_report:
  month: "January 2026"
  
  efficiency:
    open_roles: 5
    roles_filled: 2
    avg_time_to_fill: "28 days"
    avg_cost_per_hire: "$4,200"
    
  quality:
    90_day_retention: "100%"
    hiring_manager_satisfaction: "4.5/5"
    new_hire_performance: "Meets/Exceeds"
    offer_acceptance_rate: "80%"
    
  pipeline:
    total_candidates_sourced: 120
    total_screened: 45
    total_interviewed: 20
    total_offers: 3
    
  channel_roi:
    referrals: { hires: 1, cost: "$3K", time: "14 days" }
    linkedin: { hires: 1, cost: "$5K", time: "35 days" }
    inbound: { hires: 0, applicants: 80, quality: "low" }
    
  insights:
    - "Referral hires 2.5x faster and 40% cheaper than LinkedIn"
    - "Technical interview pass rate dropped — recalibrate questions"
    - "3 candidates lost to slow scheduling — fix bottleneck"

---

9. EDGE CASES & ADVANCED SCENARIOS

Internal Candidates

• Always interview internal candidates if they apply — even if not ideal
• Use same scorecard — fairness matters
• Provide detailed feedback regardless of outcome
• Have their current manager informed BEFORE they find out through gossip

Executive Hiring

• Use executive search firms for C-suite (worth the 25-33% fee)
• Reference checks are critical — call 6-8 people, not just the 3 they provide
• Board/investor involvement in final rounds
• Negotiate with employment attorney review

High-Volume Hiring (10+ same role)

• Build assessment rubric once, apply consistently
• Group information sessions replace individual screens
• Hire in cohorts for training efficiency
• Assign dedicated sourcer per 5 open reqs

Counteroffers

• 80% of candidates who accept counteroffers leave within 6 months
• If they need a counteroffer to stay, the relationship is already damaged
• Discuss counteroffer likelihood during screen — plant the seed early

Rehires (Boomerang Employees)

• Check: why did they leave? Has that been fixed?
• Skip redundant interview stages — focus on what's changed
• Fast-track onboarding — they know the culture

---

10. AUTOMATION OPPORTUNITIES

Things the agent can do autonomously:

• Parse resumes against role blueprint → generate screening scores
• Draft personalized outreach based on candidate's public profile
• Track pipeline stages and flag stale candidates (>5 days no movement)
• Generate weekly pipeline reports
• Draft rejection emails
• Schedule interview reminders
• Research candidate backgrounds (public info only)
• Build boolean search strings for new roles
• Flag compensation misalignment early

Things requiring human approval:

• Final hire/no-hire decisions
• Offer amounts and terms
• Sending outreach messages (review personalization)
• Reference check calls
• Sensitive feedback delivery