Crawler Summary

prior-auth-research-agent answer-first brief

CrewAI + RAG: Most broken workflow in healthcare <div align="center"> <br /> πŸ“‹ Prior Authorization Research Agent **Prior auth kills care delivery.** **AMA: 93% of physicians report care delays. 82% report patient abandonment.** **Clinicians spend 14+ hours per week on paperwork that delivers zero clinical value.** This agent automates the research and justification pipeline **end-to-end** β€” policy retrieval, criteria matching, denial risk assessment, structured s Capability contract not published. No trust telemetry is available yet. Last updated 4/15/2026.

Freshness

Last checked 4/15/2026

Best For

prior-auth-research-agent is best for crewai, multi-agent workflows where OpenClaw compatibility matters.

Not Ideal For

Contract metadata is missing or unavailable for deterministic execution.

Evidence Sources Checked

editorial-content, GITHUB REPOS, runtime-metrics, public facts pack

Claim this agent
Agent DossierGITHUB REPOSSafety: 66/100

prior-auth-research-agent

CrewAI + RAG: Most broken workflow in healthcare <div align="center"> <br /> πŸ“‹ Prior Authorization Research Agent **Prior auth kills care delivery.** **AMA: 93% of physicians report care delays. 82% report patient abandonment.** **Clinicians spend 14+ hours per week on paperwork that delivers zero clinical value.** This agent automates the research and justification pipeline **end-to-end** β€” policy retrieval, criteria matching, denial risk assessment, structured s

OpenClawself-declared

Public facts

4

Change events

1

Artifacts

0

Freshness

Apr 15, 2026

Verifiededitorial-contentNo verified compatibility signals

Capability contract not published. No trust telemetry is available yet. Last updated 4/15/2026.

Trust evidence available

Trust score

Unknown

Compatibility

OpenClaw

Freshness

Apr 15, 2026

Vendor

Jsfaulkner86

Artifacts

0

Benchmarks

0

Last release

Unpublished

Executive Summary

Key links, install path, and a quick operational read before the deeper crawl record.

Verifiededitorial-content

Summary

Capability contract not published. No trust telemetry is available yet. Last updated 4/15/2026.

Setup snapshot

  1. 1

    Setup complexity is LOW. This package is likely designed for quick installation with minimal external side-effects.

  2. 2

    Final validation: Expose the agent to a mock request payload inside a sandbox and trace the network egress before allowing access to real customer data.

Evidence Ledger

Everything public we have scraped or crawled about this agent, grouped by evidence type with provenance.

Verifiededitorial-content
Vendor (1)

Vendor

Jsfaulkner86

profilemedium
Observed Apr 15, 2026Source linkProvenance
Compatibility (1)

Protocol compatibility

OpenClaw

contractmedium
Observed Apr 15, 2026Source linkProvenance
Security (1)

Handshake status

UNKNOWN

trustmedium
Observed unknownSource linkProvenance
Integration (1)

Crawlable docs

6 indexed pages on the official domain

search_documentmedium
Observed Apr 15, 2026Source linkProvenance

Release & Crawl Timeline

Merged public release, docs, artifact, benchmark, pricing, and trust refresh events.

Self-declaredagent-index

Artifacts Archive

Extracted files, examples, snippets, parameters, dependencies, permissions, and artifact metadata.

Self-declaredGITHUB REPOS

Extracted files

0

Examples

5

Snippets

0

Languages

python

Executable Examples

text

β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”
β”‚                     Auth Request Input                          β”‚
β”‚          patient context Β· CPT code Β· diagnosis Β· payer          β”‚
β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”¬β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜
                              β”‚
                              β–Ό
β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”
β”‚              CrewAI Sequential Agent Pipeline                    β”‚
β”‚                                                                  β”‚
β”‚  β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”                                    β”‚
β”‚  β”‚  Policy Retriever Agent          β”‚                            β”‚
β”‚  β”‚  RAG over payer LCD/NCD docs     β”‚                            β”‚
β”‚  β”‚  vector search Β· rerank Β· compressβ”‚                            β”‚
β”‚  β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”¬β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜                                    β”‚
β”‚               β”‚ criteria list                                      β”‚
β”‚               β–Ό                                                   β”‚
β”‚  β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”                                    β”‚
β”‚  β”‚  Criteria Matcher Agent          β”‚                            β”‚
β”‚  β”‚  clinical notes vs. policy       β”‚                            β”‚
β”‚  β”‚  met/not-met checklist + gaps    β”‚                            β”‚
β”‚  β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”¬β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜                                    β”‚
β”‚               β”‚ match results + gaps                               β”‚
β”‚               β–Ό                                                   β”‚
β”‚  β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”                                    β”‚
β”‚  β”‚  Decision Summarizer Agent       β”‚                            β”‚
β”‚  β”‚  justification narrative draft   β”‚                            β”‚
β”‚  β”‚  denial risk code flagging       β”‚                            β”‚
β”‚  β”‚  Approve / Deny / Pend output    β”‚                            β”‚
β”‚  β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”¬β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜                                    β”‚
β”‚               β”‚                                                   β”‚
β”‚        

text

prior-auth-research-agent/
β”œβ”€β”€ app.py                          # Streamlit UI for interactive request submission
β”œβ”€β”€ main.py                         # CrewAI crew definition and kickoff entry point
β”œβ”€β”€ requirements.txt
β”œβ”€β”€ .env.example
β”‚
β”œβ”€β”€ audit/
β”‚   β”œβ”€β”€ models.py                   # PriorAuthAuditEvent model (10 event types)
β”‚   β”œβ”€β”€ logger.py                   # Append-only asyncpg writer β€” never raises
β”‚   β”œβ”€β”€ queries.py                  # Denial risk summary, payer approval rates, CPT volume
β”‚   └── migrations/
β”‚       └── 001_create_prior_auth_audit_log.sql
β”‚
└── tests/
    └── test_audit.py

text

auth_request_received
    └── policy_research_started
            └── policy_research_completed
                    └── criteria_match_started
                            └── criteria_match_completed
                                    └── denial_risk_assessed
                                            └── justification_drafted
                                                    └── auth_request_ready
                                                    └── human_review_flagged
                                                    └── auth_request_failed

bash

git clone https://github.com/jsfaulkner86/prior-auth-research-agent
cd prior-auth-research-agent
python -m venv venv && source venv/bin/activate
pip install -r requirements.txt
cp .env.example .env

# Initialize audit log
psql $DATABASE_URL -f audit/migrations/001_create_prior_auth_audit_log.sql

# Run Streamlit UI
streamlit run app.py

# Or run headless
python main.py

# Run tests
pytest tests/ -v

env

OPENAI_API_KEY=your_key_here
DATABASE_URL=postgresql://user:pass@localhost:5432/prior_auth_db
AUDIT_LOG_ENABLED=true
HIPAA_MODE=true
VECTOR_STORE_PATH=./vector_store

Docs & README

Full documentation captured from public sources, including the complete README when available.

Self-declaredGITHUB REPOS

Docs source

GITHUB REPOS

Editorial quality

ready

CrewAI + RAG: Most broken workflow in healthcare <div align="center"> <br /> πŸ“‹ Prior Authorization Research Agent **Prior auth kills care delivery.** **AMA: 93% of physicians report care delays. 82% report patient abandonment.** **Clinicians spend 14+ hours per week on paperwork that delivers zero clinical value.** This agent automates the research and justification pipeline **end-to-end** β€” policy retrieval, criteria matching, denial risk assessment, structured s

Full README
<div align="center"> <br />

πŸ“‹ Prior Authorization Research Agent

Prior auth kills care delivery.
AMA: 93% of physicians report care delays. 82% report patient abandonment.
Clinicians spend 14+ hours per week on paperwork that delivers zero clinical value.

This agent automates the research and justification pipeline end-to-end β€”
policy retrieval, criteria matching, denial risk assessment, structured submission output β€”
with a full append-only audit trail on every decision.

<br />

Python CrewAI RAG CMS-0057-F HIPAA Epic License

<br />

Architecture Β· Agent Crew Β· X12 278 Context Β· Denial Codes Β· Quick Start

<br /> </div>

The Real Problem

I spent 14 years architecting clinical workflows across 12 enterprise Epic health systems. Prior auth was broken at every single one of them.

The workflow looked the same everywhere:

MA pulls the CPT. Looks up the payer portal. Navigates to the medical necessity criteria PDF. Reads through 40 pages of coverage policy. Matches clinical notes against criteria manually. Drafts a justification narrative. Submits. Waits. Gets denied. Starts over.

This happens thousands of times per day in every health system. There is no AI in that loop. There is no intelligence in that loop. There's just a human doing pattern matching between a PDF and a chart note.

This agent replaces that loop.


What It Does

| Manual Workflow | This Agent | |---|---| | MA navigates payer portal manually | Policy Retriever Agent does RAG over ingested payer LCD/NCD docs | | Clinician reads 40-page criteria PDF | Criteria Matcher Agent returns met/not-met checklist with citations | | Staff drafts justification narrative by hand | Decision Summarizer Agent generates structured justification output | | Denial discovered after submission | Denial risk codes flagged before submission with rebuttal language | | Low-confidence cases fail silently | HUMAN_REVIEW_FLAGGED event surfaced explicitly for clinical escalation | | Zero audit trail on AI-assisted decisions | Append-only event log on every agent transition, CMS-0057-F compliant |


Screenshots

<img width="1433" alt="Prior Auth Agent UI β€” request submission" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/7a6ae2d3-c4ca-498d-9f9c-2558072f71d9" /> <img width="1428" alt="Prior Auth Agent Output β€” justification + denial risk" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/d0d7dcd0-3f1e-462c-9b0a-eb2eff175f6c" />

System Architecture

β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”
β”‚                     Auth Request Input                          β”‚
β”‚          patient context Β· CPT code Β· diagnosis Β· payer          β”‚
β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”¬β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜
                              β”‚
                              β–Ό
β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”
β”‚              CrewAI Sequential Agent Pipeline                    β”‚
β”‚                                                                  β”‚
β”‚  β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”                                    β”‚
β”‚  β”‚  Policy Retriever Agent          β”‚                            β”‚
β”‚  β”‚  RAG over payer LCD/NCD docs     β”‚                            β”‚
β”‚  β”‚  vector search Β· rerank Β· compressβ”‚                            β”‚
β”‚  β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”¬β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜                                    β”‚
β”‚               β”‚ criteria list                                      β”‚
β”‚               β–Ό                                                   β”‚
β”‚  β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”                                    β”‚
β”‚  β”‚  Criteria Matcher Agent          β”‚                            β”‚
β”‚  β”‚  clinical notes vs. policy       β”‚                            β”‚
β”‚  β”‚  met/not-met checklist + gaps    β”‚                            β”‚
β”‚  β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”¬β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜                                    β”‚
β”‚               β”‚ match results + gaps                               β”‚
β”‚               β–Ό                                                   β”‚
β”‚  β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”                                    β”‚
β”‚  β”‚  Decision Summarizer Agent       β”‚                            β”‚
β”‚  β”‚  justification narrative draft   β”‚                            β”‚
β”‚  β”‚  denial risk code flagging       β”‚                            β”‚
β”‚  β”‚  Approve / Deny / Pend output    β”‚                            β”‚
β”‚  β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”¬β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜                                    β”‚
β”‚               β”‚                                                   β”‚
β”‚               β–Ό                                                   β”‚
β”‚  β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”                                    β”‚
β”‚  β”‚  Confidence Check                β”‚                            β”‚
β”‚  β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”¬β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”¬β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜                                    β”‚
β”‚         β”‚ high            β”‚ low                                   β”‚
β”‚         β–Ό                 β–Ό                                       β”‚
β”‚  βœ… Auth Request Ready   πŸ” Human Review Flagged                    β”‚
β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜
          β”‚ Append-only audit log on every agent transition
          β–Ό
β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”
β”‚  PostgreSQL: prior_auth_audit_log (append-only)                  β”‚
β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜

Agent Crew

Core Design Principles

  • Sequential crew, not parallel β€” each agent's output is the next agent's input. Policy retrieval must complete before criteria matching; criteria results must exist before denial risk assessment.
  • RAG over payer policy documents β€” the Policy Retriever Agent queries a vector store of ingested payer LCD/NCD documents rather than relying on LLM training data, which is stale the moment a payer updates their policy.
  • Human review as a first-class output β€” low confidence does not produce a silent failure. It produces a HUMAN_REVIEW_FLAGGED event and surfaces the request for clinical escalation.
  • Denial risk is preemptive β€” the Decision Summarizer drafts rebuttal language for likely denial codes before submission, not after denial.

Repository Structure

prior-auth-research-agent/
β”œβ”€β”€ app.py                          # Streamlit UI for interactive request submission
β”œβ”€β”€ main.py                         # CrewAI crew definition and kickoff entry point
β”œβ”€β”€ requirements.txt
β”œβ”€β”€ .env.example
β”‚
β”œβ”€β”€ audit/
β”‚   β”œβ”€β”€ models.py                   # PriorAuthAuditEvent model (10 event types)
β”‚   β”œβ”€β”€ logger.py                   # Append-only asyncpg writer β€” never raises
β”‚   β”œβ”€β”€ queries.py                  # Denial risk summary, payer approval rates, CPT volume
β”‚   └── migrations/
β”‚       └── 001_create_prior_auth_audit_log.sql
β”‚
└── tests/
    └── test_audit.py

Technology Stack

| Layer | Technology | Rationale | |---|---|---| | Agent Orchestration | CrewAI | Role-based crew pattern β€” each agent has a distinct domain responsibility | | Pattern | Sequential Multi-Agent + RAG | Policy retrieval must complete before criteria matching; no parallelism risk | | Retrieval | LangChain RAG + vector store | Payer policy docs are too large and too frequently updated for LLM training data | | LLM | OpenAI GPT-4o | Structured justification drafting + criteria assessment | | Audit Store | PostgreSQL + asyncpg | Append-only event log with denial code array indexing | | UI | Streamlit | Clinical-facing interface for request submission and output review | | Language | Python 3.11+ | Async-native; Pydantic v2; type hints throughout |


Prior Auth Workflow Context

The X12 278 Transaction Lifecycle

Prior auth in production health systems follows the X12 278 EDI standard. This agent addresses steps 5–7.

| Step | Transaction | Description | Coverage | |---|---|---|---| | 1 | X12 270 | Eligibility inquiry | ❌ Upstream | | 2 | X12 271 | Eligibility response | ❌ Upstream | | 3 | X12 278 Request | Auth request submission | πŸ“‹ Roadmap | | 4 | X12 278 Response | Payer approval/denial | πŸ“‹ Roadmap | | 5 | Policy Research | Medical necessity criteria lookup | βœ… Policy Retriever Agent | | 6 | Clinical Justification | Narrative drafting against criteria | βœ… Criteria Matcher Agent | | 7 | Decision Summary | Approve / Deny / Pend rationale | βœ… Decision Summarizer Agent | | 8 | Peer-to-Peer | Clinical escalation for denials | πŸ“‹ Roadmap | | 9 | Appeal | Formal denial appeal submission | πŸ“‹ Roadmap |

Denial Codes Addressed

| Code | Meaning | Agent Response | |---|---|---| | CO-4 | Not authorized | Policy gaps flagged by Policy Retriever | | CO-50 | Not medically necessary | Clinical justification narrative built against necessity criteria | | CO-97 | CPT bundling conflict | CPT bundling flag in criteria match | | CO-167 | Diagnosis not covered | ICD-10 alignment check | | PR-204 | Not covered by plan | Coverage verification flag |


Audit Event Lifecycle

Every agent transition writes an immutable event. No silent operations.

auth_request_received
    └── policy_research_started
            └── policy_research_completed
                    └── criteria_match_started
                            └── criteria_match_completed
                                    └── denial_risk_assessed
                                            └── justification_drafted
                                                    └── auth_request_ready
                                                    └── human_review_flagged
                                                    └── auth_request_failed

Compliance Posture

  • HIPAA: patient_id stored as de-identified token. Never log raw MRN, name, or DOB. Connect live Epic FHIR context only through a system-to-system SMART-on-FHIR integration with a signed BAA.
  • CMS-0057-F: The 2024 CMS Interoperability and Prior Authorization Rule requires documentation of automated PA decision support. The prior_auth_audit_log append-only event log satisfies this requirement.
  • Denial Transparency: Every auth_request_ready event records denial_risk_codes[] β€” the specific codes the agent preemptively addressed. Documented due diligence in any payer dispute.

Known Failure Modes

Production healthcare AI needs an honest failure mode table. Here's mine.

| Failure Mode | Impact | Mitigation | |---|---|---| | Stale payer policy docs in vector store | Criteria mismatch β€” incorrect justification | Schedule nightly policy document refresh; version-stamp embeddings | | LLM hallucinates CPT criteria | False-positive criteria-met determination | Retrieval-grounded output only β€” LLM must cite retrieved chunks, not training data | | Payer changes criteria between request and response | Valid at submission, invalid at review | Log policy_research_completed timestamp; flag if payer policy version changed | | Low confidence on rare CPT codes | Excessive human review flags | Expand policy corpus for rare procedures; fall back to human review explicitly |


Local Development

git clone https://github.com/jsfaulkner86/prior-auth-research-agent
cd prior-auth-research-agent
python -m venv venv && source venv/bin/activate
pip install -r requirements.txt
cp .env.example .env

# Initialize audit log
psql $DATABASE_URL -f audit/migrations/001_create_prior_auth_audit_log.sql

# Run Streamlit UI
streamlit run app.py

# Or run headless
python main.py

# Run tests
pytest tests/ -v

Environment Variables

OPENAI_API_KEY=your_key_here
DATABASE_URL=postgresql://user:pass@localhost:5432/prior_auth_db
AUDIT_LOG_ENABLED=true
HIPAA_MODE=true
VECTOR_STORE_PATH=./vector_store

Roadmap

  • [ ] Payer-specific policy document ingestion pipeline with version tracking
  • [ ] X12 278 electronic submission integration
  • [ ] Appeals agent for denied authorizations
  • [ ] Epic FHIR live patient context via ehr-mcp
  • [ ] Peer-to-peer escalation workflow
  • [ ] LangSmith tracing for production observability

If You're Building Healthcare AI

If this pattern is useful to you, a ⭐ helps others find it.

If you're a health system, payer, or women's health tech company trying to automate prior auth β€” this is the kind of system I architect at The Faulkner Group.


<div align="center">

Part of The Faulkner Group's healthcare agentic AI portfolio β†’ github.com/jsfaulkner86

Built from 14 years and 12 Epic enterprise health system deployments.

</div>

Contract & API

Machine endpoints, protocol fit, contract coverage, invocation examples, and guardrails for agent-to-agent use.

MissingGITHUB REPOS

Contract coverage

Status

missing

Auth

None

Streaming

No

Data region

Unspecified

Protocol support

OpenClaw: self-declared

Requires: none

Forbidden: none

Guardrails

Operational confidence: low

No positive guardrails captured.
Invocation examples
curl -s "https://xpersona.co/api/v1/agents/crewai-jsfaulkner86-prior-auth-research-agent/snapshot"
curl -s "https://xpersona.co/api/v1/agents/crewai-jsfaulkner86-prior-auth-research-agent/contract"
curl -s "https://xpersona.co/api/v1/agents/crewai-jsfaulkner86-prior-auth-research-agent/trust"

Reliability & Benchmarks

Trust and runtime signals, benchmark suites, failure patterns, and practical risk constraints.

Missingruntime-metrics

Trust signals

Handshake

UNKNOWN

Confidence

unknown

Attempts 30d

unknown

Fallback rate

unknown

Runtime metrics

Observed P50

unknown

Observed P95

unknown

Rate limit

unknown

Estimated cost

unknown

Do not use if

Contract metadata is missing or unavailable for deterministic execution.
No benchmark suites or observed failure patterns are available.

Media & Demo

Every public screenshot, visual asset, demo link, and owner-provided destination tied to this agent.

Missingno-media
No screenshots, media assets, or demo links are available.

Related Agents

Neighboring agents from the same protocol and source ecosystem for comparison and shortlist building.

Self-declaredprotocol-neighbors
GITHUB_REPOSactivepieces

Rank

70

AI Agents & MCPs & AI Workflow Automation β€’ (~400 MCP servers for AI agents) β€’ AI Automation / AI Agent with MCPs β€’ AI Workflows & AI Agents β€’ MCPs for AI Agents

Traction

No public download signal

Freshness

Updated 2d ago

OPENCLAW
GITHUB_REPOScherry-studio

Rank

70

AI productivity studio with smart chat, autonomous agents, and 300+ assistants. Unified access to frontier LLMs

Traction

No public download signal

Freshness

Updated 6d ago

MCPOPENCLAW
GITHUB_REPOSAionUi

Rank

70

Free, local, open-source 24/7 Cowork app and OpenClaw for Gemini CLI, Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, Qwen Code, Goose CLI, Auggie, and more | 🌟 Star if you like it!

Traction

No public download signal

Freshness

Updated 6d ago

MCPOPENCLAW
GITHUB_REPOSCopilotKit

Rank

70

The Frontend for Agents & Generative UI. React + Angular

Traction

No public download signal

Freshness

Updated 23d ago

OPENCLAW
Machine Appendix

Contract JSON

{
  "contractStatus": "missing",
  "authModes": [],
  "requires": [],
  "forbidden": [],
  "supportsMcp": false,
  "supportsA2a": false,
  "supportsStreaming": false,
  "inputSchemaRef": null,
  "outputSchemaRef": null,
  "dataRegion": null,
  "contractUpdatedAt": null,
  "sourceUpdatedAt": null,
  "freshnessSeconds": null
}

Invocation Guide

{
  "preferredApi": {
    "snapshotUrl": "https://xpersona.co/api/v1/agents/crewai-jsfaulkner86-prior-auth-research-agent/snapshot",
    "contractUrl": "https://xpersona.co/api/v1/agents/crewai-jsfaulkner86-prior-auth-research-agent/contract",
    "trustUrl": "https://xpersona.co/api/v1/agents/crewai-jsfaulkner86-prior-auth-research-agent/trust"
  },
  "curlExamples": [
    "curl -s \"https://xpersona.co/api/v1/agents/crewai-jsfaulkner86-prior-auth-research-agent/snapshot\"",
    "curl -s \"https://xpersona.co/api/v1/agents/crewai-jsfaulkner86-prior-auth-research-agent/contract\"",
    "curl -s \"https://xpersona.co/api/v1/agents/crewai-jsfaulkner86-prior-auth-research-agent/trust\""
  ],
  "jsonRequestTemplate": {
    "query": "summarize this repo",
    "constraints": {
      "maxLatencyMs": 2000,
      "protocolPreference": [
        "OPENCLEW"
      ]
    }
  },
  "jsonResponseTemplate": {
    "ok": true,
    "result": {
      "summary": "...",
      "confidence": 0.9
    },
    "meta": {
      "source": "GITHUB_REPOS",
      "generatedAt": "2026-04-17T06:07:06.327Z"
    }
  },
  "retryPolicy": {
    "maxAttempts": 3,
    "backoffMs": [
      500,
      1500,
      3500
    ],
    "retryableConditions": [
      "HTTP_429",
      "HTTP_503",
      "NETWORK_TIMEOUT"
    ]
  }
}

Trust JSON

{
  "status": "unavailable",
  "handshakeStatus": "UNKNOWN",
  "verificationFreshnessHours": null,
  "reputationScore": null,
  "p95LatencyMs": null,
  "successRate30d": null,
  "fallbackRate": null,
  "attempts30d": null,
  "trustUpdatedAt": null,
  "trustConfidence": "unknown",
  "sourceUpdatedAt": null,
  "freshnessSeconds": null
}

Capability Matrix

{
  "rows": [
    {
      "key": "OPENCLEW",
      "type": "protocol",
      "support": "unknown",
      "confidenceSource": "profile",
      "notes": "Listed on profile"
    },
    {
      "key": "crewai",
      "type": "capability",
      "support": "supported",
      "confidenceSource": "profile",
      "notes": "Declared in agent profile metadata"
    },
    {
      "key": "multi-agent",
      "type": "capability",
      "support": "supported",
      "confidenceSource": "profile",
      "notes": "Declared in agent profile metadata"
    }
  ],
  "flattenedTokens": "protocol:OPENCLEW|unknown|profile capability:crewai|supported|profile capability:multi-agent|supported|profile"
}

Facts JSON

[
  {
    "factKey": "vendor",
    "category": "vendor",
    "label": "Vendor",
    "value": "Jsfaulkner86",
    "href": "https://github.com/jsfaulkner86/prior-auth-research-agent",
    "sourceUrl": "https://github.com/jsfaulkner86/prior-auth-research-agent",
    "sourceType": "profile",
    "confidence": "medium",
    "observedAt": "2026-04-15T06:04:08.271Z",
    "isPublic": true
  },
  {
    "factKey": "protocols",
    "category": "compatibility",
    "label": "Protocol compatibility",
    "value": "OpenClaw",
    "href": "https://xpersona.co/api/v1/agents/crewai-jsfaulkner86-prior-auth-research-agent/contract",
    "sourceUrl": "https://xpersona.co/api/v1/agents/crewai-jsfaulkner86-prior-auth-research-agent/contract",
    "sourceType": "contract",
    "confidence": "medium",
    "observedAt": "2026-04-15T06:04:08.271Z",
    "isPublic": true
  },
  {
    "factKey": "docs_crawl",
    "category": "integration",
    "label": "Crawlable docs",
    "value": "6 indexed pages on the official domain",
    "href": "https://github.com/login?return_to=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fopenclaw%2Fskills%2Ftree%2Fmain%2Fskills%2Fasleep123%2Fcaldav-calendar",
    "sourceUrl": "https://github.com/login?return_to=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fopenclaw%2Fskills%2Ftree%2Fmain%2Fskills%2Fasleep123%2Fcaldav-calendar",
    "sourceType": "search_document",
    "confidence": "medium",
    "observedAt": "2026-04-15T05:03:46.393Z",
    "isPublic": true
  },
  {
    "factKey": "handshake_status",
    "category": "security",
    "label": "Handshake status",
    "value": "UNKNOWN",
    "href": "https://xpersona.co/api/v1/agents/crewai-jsfaulkner86-prior-auth-research-agent/trust",
    "sourceUrl": "https://xpersona.co/api/v1/agents/crewai-jsfaulkner86-prior-auth-research-agent/trust",
    "sourceType": "trust",
    "confidence": "medium",
    "observedAt": null,
    "isPublic": true
  }
]

Change Events JSON

[
  {
    "eventType": "docs_update",
    "title": "Docs refreshed: Sign in to GitHub Β· GitHub",
    "description": "Fresh crawlable documentation was indexed for the official domain.",
    "href": "https://github.com/login?return_to=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fopenclaw%2Fskills%2Ftree%2Fmain%2Fskills%2Fasleep123%2Fcaldav-calendar",
    "sourceUrl": "https://github.com/login?return_to=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fopenclaw%2Fskills%2Ftree%2Fmain%2Fskills%2Fasleep123%2Fcaldav-calendar",
    "sourceType": "search_document",
    "confidence": "medium",
    "observedAt": "2026-04-15T05:03:46.393Z",
    "isPublic": true
  }
]

Sponsored

Ads related to prior-auth-research-agent and adjacent AI workflows.